This week Russell Brand uploaded a video in which he explained why he wore a cross pendant, and in the short video talked about how he is exploring Christianity. He spoke about having the maturity now to move past previous misconceptions of Christianity, and how having a personal relationship with God and reading the Bible was something he is walking towards. Having followed Brand’s career for a few years, and finding him someone who can well articulate his ideas, I was encouraged by this. Then I read the comments. (NB. never read the comments!) What ensued was a series of encouragements, but also a debate over Brand himself, his personality, his views on society and government, the style of cross he was wearing, and his recent publicity in the media. All of which do warrant a bit of debate, albeit not here. Yet, it made me think about how many times something happens and our reaction of ‘Yes, but…” He is wearing a cross pendant. Yes, but it’s not the one we might chose. He’s reading the Bible. Yes, but he’s reading the Purpose Driven Life and we might not like Rick Warren. Yes, but. Yes, but. Often times we prefer language and intention in those exploring Christianity that is surprising to me. When people are exploring Christianity, I’d much prefer to welcome them with the understanding they have, and let God shape them as they grow through it.
In a world that is becoming increasingly diverse and interconnected, the language we use plays a pivotal role in shaping our understanding and connection with others. Nowhere is this more evident than in the realm of evangelism in pioneering contexts, where the use of religious language can either foster inclusivity or erect barriers. In the context of Christianity, there is a growing need for churches to care less about the religious language people use as they embark on their exploration of faith. We want to make sure things are ‘right.’ However, a shift towards embracing authenticity can create a more inclusive and welcoming environment for seekers, fostering a genuine connection with the core message of Christianity. I’ve noted down a few thoughts of how this approach might help us.
The Evolving Landscape of Language
Language is a very dynamic thing. Don’t believe me, chat to a 14 year old and try to work out what they are saying! (Also, don’t try to speak with their language or you’ll become ‘cringe’ - believe me, I’ve tried!) Language is constantly evolving to reflect the changing social and cultural landscapes. Within the context of Christianity, the religious language that has been traditionally employed may inadvertently alienate those who are exploring the faith for the first time. Words like "redemption," "salvation," or "sanctification" might hold profound theological significance, but for newcomers, they may be barriers that obscure the simplicity and beauty of the Christian message. By caring less about the rigid adherence to specific religious vocabulary, churches can create an atmosphere that encourages open dialogue and genuine exploration. This doesn't mean diluting the core tenets of the faith but rather translating them into language that resonates with the diverse perspectives of a modern audience. We need to be able to understand what terms mean as well as just say them, and be able to give an explanation of why we do and say certain things to people who just think they are weird.
Breaking Down Barriers
The use of exclusive religious language can inadvertently create barriers, turning Christianity into an exclusive club with a secret code. Churches should aspire to be places where seekers feel welcomed and accepted, regardless of their familiarity with religious jargon. When churches care less about the religious language, they send a powerful message of inclusivity, breaking down barriers that might otherwise hinder individuals from fully engaging with the Christian message. This approach aligns with the teachings of Jesus, who communicated profound truths using simple and relatable language, such as parables. His ability to connect with people from all walks of life serves as a timeless example for churches seeking to emulate a more inclusive and accessible communication style.
Prioritizing Relationship Over Rhetoric
Christianity, at its core, is about a relationship—with God and with one another. When churches prioritize this relational aspect over rigid religious rhetoric, they create a space where individuals feel valued for who they are - as image bearers of God - rather than judged for their linguistic proficiency in matters of faith. The Apostle Paul's writings often emphasize the importance of love and understanding within the Christian community. In his letter to the Corinthians, he writes, "If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal" (1 Corinthians 13:1, ESV). This profound insight reminds us that the essence of Christianity lies not in eloquent religious language but in the transformative power of love. This relies a lot on discernment, or indeed asking good questions as to what people mean when they use certain words, and often we can assume that when people say things, they understand them. In building relationships we allow space for this to happen, becoming people of conversation and not just conversion to our ways.
Authenticity Breeds Connection
One of the key reasons churches should think about how they use religious language is that authentic communication fosters genuine connection. When individuals feel free to express their thoughts and questions without fear of judgment, it creates an environment where true spiritual exploration can take place. One thing I love about our church family is the openness to ask questions - even the most random ones! Questions from someone in their 80s as well as a 12 year old. I have lost count of how many profound moments we have had as a church with a conversation starting, “This might make me sound stupid but…” Authenticity allows for an open exchange of ideas, doubts, and experiences, fostering a sense of community where individuals can grow in their faith together. The Bible itself contains diverse literary genres, reflecting the authenticity of human experience. From the poetry of the Psalms to the narrative of the Gospels, the Bible demonstrates that God's truth can be communicated through various forms of language. Churches can follow this example by embracing the authenticity of individuals' language and experiences, recognizing that the richness of faith is not confined to specific religious buzzwords.
Conclusion
In a world that is becoming more interconnected and diverse, the language used in religious discourse must evolve to remain relevant and inclusive. Once again, I repeat - this does not mean changing the meaning or purpose of biblical truth, but helping people connect with it and develop in their understanding of it. Churches, as the bearers of the Christian message, play a crucial role in creating an environment where individuals feel welcomed and valued, irrespective of their familiarity with religious language. By caring less about rigid linguistic norms, churches can break down barriers, prioritize relationships, and foster authentic connections that lead to a deeper understanding of the transformative power of Christianity. In embracing authenticity, churches can truly embody the essence of their faith and provide a welcoming space for all who seek to explore the journey of Christianity. I’ll watch the unfolding story of Russell Brand prayerfully, knowing that on this exploration of the Bible will lead Him to a God who invites Him to rest and know true salvation and peace.
Comments